21 Comments
User's avatar
Jonathan Engler's avatar

That’s a great spot (the BBC article). I’d never seen it before. Covers a lot of the ground I did in my nocebo pieces.

https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/publish/posts?search=Nocebo

Expand full comment
Ever Thus's avatar

The Adversary always seeks to use human capacities against the humans. Our powerful imaginations are creative forces for manifestation. Our desire to help others was leveraged to get people to self harm over and over. Good analysis. Thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Beg to differ - Only thing that leaked was fear...

It was a trauma based mind control event.

People were scared shitless and when they got to the hospitals, they were given end of life protocols.

The main killer and the bigger plan was to get people to partake in the experimental vax roll out.

The big pharma companies knew what side effects would happen and got ready to make even more money treating the vaccine injured.

People stil today have yet to realise what happened to them on 9/11 and how that cover-up is still in play.

There was a governmental narrative put out, which is a plain conspiracy theory that two little planes caused all that damage at the WTC - What is astounding is that people still drink that coolaid narrative.

Then with 9/11, you had the emergence of the 9/11 "truth" movement.

A lot like the "health freedom movement" now after CV-19.

The 9/11 truth movement and the health freedom movement have been infiltrated by COINTELPRO agents, to steer the narratives, away from actual truth.

Then you have the third level - Where people are pointing out the bullshit government narrative and that of the so called truther movement.

The 3rd level are the marginalized researchers, the so called kooks and the whacky conspiracy theorist, according to those that drink the coolaid of the government and the "truth" movement.

Too few people understood 9/11, so we got COVID.

My interview with Jerm Warfare: https://www.jermwarfare.com/9-11-revisionism-and-why-evidence-matters/

WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?

The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

The 9/11 TRUTH vs Stand-Down PSY-OPS

Make people believe that someone or some group external to themselves is going to "save" or "rescue" them

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-truth-vs-stand-down-psy-ops

Expand full comment
Chris Waldburger's avatar

I think you should listen first...

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Great take on it - We're both on the same page.

Now, do you still think 4 planes crashed on 9/11 and the buildings went down due to jet fuel, or bombs, or thermite or nukes?

Hint: The truth is - None of the above... And people's minds melt when you tell them what actually happened.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 20
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.

You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.

You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.

If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.

Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.

Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.

She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.

Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.

By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.

The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.

The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.

Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.

Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.

Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.

If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.

But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.

People should read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY

Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.

The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.

The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.

The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.

Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.

Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html

The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden.

Read their court filings.

Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/

Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

Chris, they are listening... to themselves in their echo chamber.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.

Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.

You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.

You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.

If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.

Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.

Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.

Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.

She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.

Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.

By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.

The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.

Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.

The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.

Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.

There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.

Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.

Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.

If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.

But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY

WHO is Dr Judy Wood?

"To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence..."

Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials.

She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told. In this presentation, Judy Wood talks about her book “Where Did the Towers Go?”

The book is the culmination of years of work and study that she’s been presenting on her website DrJudyWood.com about the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01.

She has been tracking and collecting many of the anomalies witnessed on that day and found evidence for a strange effect related to the work of John Hutchison called “The Hutchison Effect.” We discuss how directed-energy weapons might have been involved in destroying the towers.

Topics Discussed: forensics, interference energy, John Hutchison, hurricane Erin, tornados, towers turning to dust, anomalies, strange effects, physics, WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6, WTC7, NIST, classified technology, The Billiard Ball Example and more.

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Just passed 15 minutes...

I'm listening...

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

I think you should work for the Trump/Putin/Musk administration AND start publishing "magical reality" stories AND stop trolling other author's topics.

Also, PLEASE "up" your meds or change them, whatever you're taking is obviously not working. Do you need a "welfare check" and psych eval? One can be easily arranged.

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

Triggered much? Maybe go read what I wrote in my articles.

Condemnation, without investigation is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.

WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?

The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

I did read your articles,. I really do think you should be writing scripts and books. Magical reality genre seems to be hot these days. Ex-CIA hitman scripts are a dime a dozen with GPTs.

If you knew anything about materials and force, you would know what happened. I'm truly surprised more buildings didn't come down. If you were there, you would have been astounded as a size of the debris, some pieces were the size of houses. WTC7 caught on fire and burned for hours. The steel in the building lost it's temper/strength like wet spaghetti. That's what happens to steel in fires.

I'll be sure to tell the family members of my friends who died in the world trade center about your articles. I'm sure they would like to "take you out" for a beer. ;)

Also see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AGpILvdwDM

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

Prof David A. Hughes – There are three key layers to perception management:

(i) the official narrative,

(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and

(iii) the truth.

9/11 Evidence presented by Prof David A. Hughes

Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke proponents, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion".

Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce

9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline – Prof David A, Hughes

Given the massive amount of evidence calling the official "9/11" narrative into question, why won't academia ask any critical questions?

Read the peer reviewed paper here: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/911-truth-and-the-silence-of-the

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

Hi Pat, Yeah we are in agreement on items 1, 2, 3..

The evidence cited is assumption and presumption. I occasionally have to tell my wife, "just be cause you think it, doesn't mean it's real, no matter how many times you repeat yourself".

I've had substack dissuasions about the explosions of the WTC 1/2. I don't know if you've ever seen steel or concrete testing, but load failures are quite impressive.

Read this substack post, you'll get a better idea of what was/is going on.

https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/911-belief-and-you

Watch read and watch the videos in one of my comments on the explosions. https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/911-belief-and-you/comment/48645354

A good friend of mine's grandmother went to university with Trotsky. She met Lenin, every time his name was mentioned, she spat on the floor. She said he was a common thief, liar and criminal. He met Stalin, a enforcer/murderer, while in prison.

Lenin's "Controlled Opposition" is a form of Tyranny (Tyranny of the masses). The leaders are tyrants, the same types of tyranny that separated the US from the British Crown.

-g

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

O, dear...

This quick 5 minute visual thought experiment will blow your mind on how easily it points to all you mentioned and linked to, can not be explained in relation to 9/11, if you just watch what is happening.

Link: https://x.com/911Revisionist/status/1900664484873859105

I hope the Lenin quote motivates you to read the article that points out the controlled opposition regarding all 9/11 narratives.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Lab Leak: An Elaborate Misdirection?

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/lab-leak-an-elaborate-misdirection/

"Each time an individual comes to understand that all facets of the official narrative of “Covid” are a fiction, that there was no “pandemic” and no “novel virus” and no “lab leak,” the world moves a step further from the lies and a step closer to the truth."

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

Hi Chris,

I read Verduyn’s piece on the analysis. the numbers and dates seems correct "as reported". The attribution analysis starts January of 2020. However, the infection rates and number of deaths indicate earlier outbreaks somewhere about Aug 2019. Although requested, 2019 viral pneumonia deaths from other towns including Jingmen, Jingzhou, Xiogan, Xianing, Suizhou and other were not provided, likely attributions were not tracked and samples were not taken or retained.

In Western US, deaths of 40+, healthy, male patients from unknown viral pneumonia were seen in about Oct 2019. Samples were not analyzed for months by CDC due low priority and staffing issues. By the time samples were analyzed, the virus was already vigorous and mutating in US domestic populations.

Wuhan is located in the Jianghan Plain, it is a relatively large center for local businesses. Numerous markets, ppl on streets with both regular and irregular travel patterns. Travel in Wuhan is by major roads, buses, rail, Han and Yantze rivers, and Wuhan Tianhe International Airport. Immediate surrounding areas are primarily farm lands.

Infection could have easily commutated from Wuhan to other provinces and villages where reporting would not be possible or a priority for govt agencies. Often, we don't know what's important until after a sentinel event. We cannot predict the future, presupposition only indicates something awful will happen. We don't need a crystal ball to know that.

Is it conceivable the SARS/Cov evolved in another province or town and spread to Wuhan petri-dish? Yes... Due to the RNA signatures found in the virus, it is highly likely there was some human manipulation. Could a manipulated, inert virus have escaped from a Wuhan lab and fuse with deadly virus in the wild ? Yes, that may have happened as well.

The world is an inconsistent, complicated place that operates by it's own rules. Although we'd like, it does not operate by the "smoothing rules" created by statisticians.

Expand full comment
Chris Waldburger's avatar

The trouble is that this all relies on the PCR testing which is famously variable. The issue of how the test protocol was established in Germany is also worth examining.

It is highly suspicious, if it was circulating in 2019, that we only saw the massive waves in NYC and Italy, as the testing was rolled out.

Expand full comment
One Good Eye's avatar

Developing PCR tests at the time was extremely difficult for a few reasons.

1. The methods were not clearly understood

2. Equipment was not available

3. Industry expertise was limited

4. Raw materials were not available

5. Unique signatures were not identified.

6. Insufficient testing and reporting infrastructure

PCR testing occurred months after sentinel breakouts. Like rhino viruses, corona viruses are highly infectious. Unlike rhino viruses, corona viruses are challenging for our immune systems to deal with. PCR tests have no reagents in contact with patients. Outside of swabs, any suggestion of contamination is ridiculous and founded in ignorance or delusion. This is one fact many conveniently forget or ignore, early PCR tests were only availed in clinical settings. Patients needed to be demonstrating symptoms before test administration. The virus was in "full swing" with thousands of ppl dying each day before home PCR testing was available.

Due to the SARS/Cov pandemic, those many of those issues with PCR were overcome. More importantly, limits and pathways to future improvements were discovered. Before this pandemic, home-based PCR testing was considered inconceivable and unobtainable. Today, it's accurate to +95% and 80% sensitivity. They do miss lowest 20% concentrations depending on a number of factors.

I don't call the results suspect. Shoot from the hip, I would say there was a 25% inaccuracy. Biology and virology is a very messy and often unclear field, especially during early stages of technology development and knowledge about mechanism(s). Continuous improvement is a necessity.

The rate of progress in PCR testing during the pandemic should be considered a monumental task, the equivalent to putting a man in orbit within a week of having the idea. Virology and biology is not like machine engineering, I would say about 1000x more complicated. Luckily, ppl are clever and smart.

Hopefully we won't need these types of skills and tempos again for another hundred years.

Expand full comment