At first I thought masks might help and bought a cycle pollution mask rather than disposable surgical ones. It came with valves and I thought "that's a bit useless". But then the gaps at the side of surgical masks are a lot bigger than the valves on my cycle pollution masks.
Then you notice that it was never mandated the type of mask that you need to wear, only that you wear one.
The masks did work, the purpose was to generate fear and keep up the illusion of a pandemic, nothing more.
Mar 23, 2023·edited Mar 23, 2023Liked by Chris Waldburger
Whilst I appreciate the succinct analysis by which you endeavour to end the covid pandemic debate... I propose an entire inversion.. It's stunningly efficient, requires far less analysis and counter arguments, scientific refutations etc..
Lets START the debate with this elephantine query:
Since when & how did/does a claimed 'novel virus' of ANY type, with a formally CDC/WHO determined & claimed IFR of 0.0013% constitute a 'pandemic'???
A disease with a 99.9987% survival rate for the majority of the global population is quite frankly a disease of ZERO concern, period, end of discussion.. and no 'large scale bioweapon demonstration' (aka, vaccine deployment) is required either 🤨
You can provide all the honest accurate surveys possible however in Canada the government and captured media will still be screaming to "get boosted" and the vaccine is "safe and effective".
After all, PM Trudeau is invested in a company that profits from the vaccine. He also accepted donations from China to his family foundation which he begrudgingly returned when he got caught.
He is in the midst of trying to whitewash his relationship with Chinese illegal election donations.
Biden is also in the middle of a scandal of secret Chinese payoffs. How many other western leaders were paid off by China and the Pharma companies.
Addition: Just in March 23rd, Epoch News just reported Chinese influence over high level Canadian politicians has been occurring for at least 30 years. Also the Chinese were asked by a Liberal politician to hold onto the two Canadian Michaels in a hostage tit for tat over Huawei's Meng Wanhzou's detainment.
My question is: Is China encouraging the deadly Covid Vaccine uptake in Western countries?
One of my "smoking guns" on the jabs: it was never possible for them to meaningfully reduce infection / transmission because that requires mucosal immunity, and the jabs can't give this as they are given intramuscularly.
So all the pressure and coercion was pure control, nothing to do with stopping any virus.
And you may also wonder how the Pfizer trials still managed to show efficacy vs infection even though it is now accepted that they don't, and that doing so was basically impossible!
Oh, also, on masks: in the UK wearing a "hidden disability" lanyard was literally treated the same as if you wore a mask (to be clear I never wore either). It was good enough, because you were demonstrating obedience and that's all that mattered. (Of course, to be fair they are also just as effective vs covid..).
The swiss cheese model is another one that annoyed me. It means that you can justify anything no matter how useless, because if we do enough useless things it might just help. That's how we ended up with the covid tyranny.
Punchy title and great aspirations, but don't you think after all this time that data, even the best data in the world, is not about to end the debate? People who have been successfully Nudged and Inoculated Against Misinformation will not engage with data unless it supports the Narrative they believe. The only way to undo that PsyOp is to expose the mechanisms by which it was perpetrated, and even that will probably not permeate the minds of those who now MUST believe the lies or face the fact that they facilitated or have fallen victim to a mass democide.
Little wonder then that it is a truism that generally governments only make matters worse. And a classic case of where doing something proved to be far worse than doing nothing. And of course the fear saturated public shouted down all the sensible, sane medical voices, historically proven responses, and existing early and effective treatments with repurposed drugs.
There NEVER were any vaccines. What was and is being injected into humanity is a deadly concoction of toxic poisons which has no truck with any virus. It is not safe and effective against any virus or disease, it is the disease. The disease of murder.
You didn't need to wait 3 years for this. Conventional verified experience had shown this was all nonsense.
The point was that politicians used theoretical unvalidated and unverified data to push policies which in any other engineering/scientific industry would get you put in prison.
The only difference now is that more non-technical people know this. And that a lot of technical people who should have known this have brought disgrace on themselves.
In 2020 a Korean hospital did a quick study of N95 masked covid patients in tented beds. They tested for and found covid virus on the OUTSIDE of the mask. It was also revealed at the time that the covid virus was smaller than the pores in an N95 mask although with its protective mucous cocoon it measured larger. This should have been a sign to investigate masking efficacy more thoroughly but I didn't see any news stories pointing to failures of masking at the time. By then however the Main Stream Media had already been bought off with government ads for pro Covid rules and then Pharma ads for vaccines in the US.
As long as critics of the viral fear pornographers buy into the "novel coronavirus" narrative, there will be no end of pandemics, no end of mutant scarriants, and no end of military countermeasures that erode our personal freedoms and strengthen the biomedical security state.
Yes, heavily vaxxed Germany has high excess mortality and lightly vaxxed Bulgaria & Romania has low excess, but where does Sweden fit in with this? According to the official stats (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1196071/covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-europe-by-country/), they had the 5th highest number of 'vaccine' doses per 100,000 population, higher even than Germany, and yet it seems they show low excess mortality. How do we explain that apparent conundrum?
Chris, although I agree that the military countermeasures of lockdown, social distancing, facial diapers and forced injections of genomic modification drugs were unjustified, you could have started your discussion with the fact that all of these crimes against humanity were based on a computer generated, in sillico "virus" that has NEVER been isolated, purified or proven to cause illness in humans or to be spread from human to human. FULL STOP.
Chris, the scientists and the journalists don’t care. They are big government sycophants of the first order. They are BLIND to (1) government’s (as an institution) inherent insatiable appetite for power and (2) inherently character flawed humans operate government. For some very weird reason (perhaps just due to mere human nature?), many people are convinced that government employees and elected officials have some unique and special human quality that makes them completely well-intentioned and expert in their jobs. It’s insanity.
At first I thought masks might help and bought a cycle pollution mask rather than disposable surgical ones. It came with valves and I thought "that's a bit useless". But then the gaps at the side of surgical masks are a lot bigger than the valves on my cycle pollution masks.
Then you notice that it was never mandated the type of mask that you need to wear, only that you wear one.
The masks did work, the purpose was to generate fear and keep up the illusion of a pandemic, nothing more.
Whilst I appreciate the succinct analysis by which you endeavour to end the covid pandemic debate... I propose an entire inversion.. It's stunningly efficient, requires far less analysis and counter arguments, scientific refutations etc..
Lets START the debate with this elephantine query:
Since when & how did/does a claimed 'novel virus' of ANY type, with a formally CDC/WHO determined & claimed IFR of 0.0013% constitute a 'pandemic'???
A disease with a 99.9987% survival rate for the majority of the global population is quite frankly a disease of ZERO concern, period, end of discussion.. and no 'large scale bioweapon demonstration' (aka, vaccine deployment) is required either 🤨
I rest my case....
You can provide all the honest accurate surveys possible however in Canada the government and captured media will still be screaming to "get boosted" and the vaccine is "safe and effective".
After all, PM Trudeau is invested in a company that profits from the vaccine. He also accepted donations from China to his family foundation which he begrudgingly returned when he got caught.
He is in the midst of trying to whitewash his relationship with Chinese illegal election donations.
Biden is also in the middle of a scandal of secret Chinese payoffs. How many other western leaders were paid off by China and the Pharma companies.
Addition: Just in March 23rd, Epoch News just reported Chinese influence over high level Canadian politicians has been occurring for at least 30 years. Also the Chinese were asked by a Liberal politician to hold onto the two Canadian Michaels in a hostage tit for tat over Huawei's Meng Wanhzou's detainment.
My question is: Is China encouraging the deadly Covid Vaccine uptake in Western countries?
And see my about to be published article in the UK Column in which I dissect TEN policies which didn't work!
One of my "smoking guns" on the jabs: it was never possible for them to meaningfully reduce infection / transmission because that requires mucosal immunity, and the jabs can't give this as they are given intramuscularly.
Eg: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733922/
So all the pressure and coercion was pure control, nothing to do with stopping any virus.
And you may also wonder how the Pfizer trials still managed to show efficacy vs infection even though it is now accepted that they don't, and that doing so was basically impossible!
Oh, also, on masks: in the UK wearing a "hidden disability" lanyard was literally treated the same as if you wore a mask (to be clear I never wore either). It was good enough, because you were demonstrating obedience and that's all that mattered. (Of course, to be fair they are also just as effective vs covid..).
The swiss cheese model is another one that annoyed me. It means that you can justify anything no matter how useless, because if we do enough useless things it might just help. That's how we ended up with the covid tyranny.
At this late date, 23 March 2023, my local hospital system CONTINUES to require the wearing of masks in all of their facilities. (Good grief!)
Punchy title and great aspirations, but don't you think after all this time that data, even the best data in the world, is not about to end the debate? People who have been successfully Nudged and Inoculated Against Misinformation will not engage with data unless it supports the Narrative they believe. The only way to undo that PsyOp is to expose the mechanisms by which it was perpetrated, and even that will probably not permeate the minds of those who now MUST believe the lies or face the fact that they facilitated or have fallen victim to a mass democide.
Little wonder then that it is a truism that generally governments only make matters worse. And a classic case of where doing something proved to be far worse than doing nothing. And of course the fear saturated public shouted down all the sensible, sane medical voices, historically proven responses, and existing early and effective treatments with repurposed drugs.
There NEVER were any vaccines. What was and is being injected into humanity is a deadly concoction of toxic poisons which has no truck with any virus. It is not safe and effective against any virus or disease, it is the disease. The disease of murder.
You didn't need to wait 3 years for this. Conventional verified experience had shown this was all nonsense.
The point was that politicians used theoretical unvalidated and unverified data to push policies which in any other engineering/scientific industry would get you put in prison.
The only difference now is that more non-technical people know this. And that a lot of technical people who should have known this have brought disgrace on themselves.
In 2020 a Korean hospital did a quick study of N95 masked covid patients in tented beds. They tested for and found covid virus on the OUTSIDE of the mask. It was also revealed at the time that the covid virus was smaller than the pores in an N95 mask although with its protective mucous cocoon it measured larger. This should have been a sign to investigate masking efficacy more thoroughly but I didn't see any news stories pointing to failures of masking at the time. By then however the Main Stream Media had already been bought off with government ads for pro Covid rules and then Pharma ads for vaccines in the US.
As long as critics of the viral fear pornographers buy into the "novel coronavirus" narrative, there will be no end of pandemics, no end of mutant scarriants, and no end of military countermeasures that erode our personal freedoms and strengthen the biomedical security state.
Yes, heavily vaxxed Germany has high excess mortality and lightly vaxxed Bulgaria & Romania has low excess, but where does Sweden fit in with this? According to the official stats (https://www.statista.com/statistics/1196071/covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-europe-by-country/), they had the 5th highest number of 'vaccine' doses per 100,000 population, higher even than Germany, and yet it seems they show low excess mortality. How do we explain that apparent conundrum?
Chris, although I agree that the military countermeasures of lockdown, social distancing, facial diapers and forced injections of genomic modification drugs were unjustified, you could have started your discussion with the fact that all of these crimes against humanity were based on a computer generated, in sillico "virus" that has NEVER been isolated, purified or proven to cause illness in humans or to be spread from human to human. FULL STOP.
Chris, the scientists and the journalists don’t care. They are big government sycophants of the first order. They are BLIND to (1) government’s (as an institution) inherent insatiable appetite for power and (2) inherently character flawed humans operate government. For some very weird reason (perhaps just due to mere human nature?), many people are convinced that government employees and elected officials have some unique and special human quality that makes them completely well-intentioned and expert in their jobs. It’s insanity.