Chris, thank you for this article, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it (and others)! I have similar concerns to those you have raised, particularly in relation to the censoring of legitimate questions regarding the potential (and actual) harms of vaccines to some, and the necessity of vaccinating those who are mostly in good health. I have seen this particularly in media’s banishing of all fair counterpoints, as in the case of Brett Weinstein’a recent discussion with Dr Malone. For a society that claims to be ‘ruled by reason’ it is a strange response. Have you engaged at all with the Weinstein discussion (YouTube have since taken it down, but it is on Apple Podcasts still)?
On another note: I wondered if you would have some time to help us understand the research of Dr Tessa Lawrie, who is making waves in the acadenic spaces with her considered work on Ivermectin as the best drug for COVID? If you have time, I would so appreciate your reflections on this.
Thanks very much, Mike. I read rather than listen to podcasts but I did see something about that YouTube censorship. I just read today that WHO altered their vaccine advice following the lead of Google and Facebook. The ruling regime is not scientific in the sense of solving problems and engaging in the field. It is a technocratic regime based on bureaucracy and conformity. Chilling. I have long wanted to take a deep dive into ivermectin. The one doc I refer to quite a bit, Peter McCullough has been the US champion of treatment. Interestingly he refers quite a bit to a South African doctor in Port Edward who was using HCQ and Ivermectin then got shut down but managed to find a treatment regime of antihistamines tailored for each day of Covid. McCullough says he gets reports of stockpiles of ivermectin and HCQ being burnt. The fact that safe, normal drugs are being demonised is a huge warning sign and tells you something is very wrong, regardless of the degree of efficacy of those drugs. All takes you back to the vaccines in the end and shots in every arm. Thanks a lot for the feedback. Will take another look at the Weinstein material.
Hi Chris, thank you for your response. Re WHO: it is scary stuff when medicine starts to follow big tech recommendations - I will have a look at this. Thanks also for the recommendation of Dr McCullough.
Chris, thank you for this article, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it (and others)! I have similar concerns to those you have raised, particularly in relation to the censoring of legitimate questions regarding the potential (and actual) harms of vaccines to some, and the necessity of vaccinating those who are mostly in good health. I have seen this particularly in media’s banishing of all fair counterpoints, as in the case of Brett Weinstein’a recent discussion with Dr Malone. For a society that claims to be ‘ruled by reason’ it is a strange response. Have you engaged at all with the Weinstein discussion (YouTube have since taken it down, but it is on Apple Podcasts still)?
On another note: I wondered if you would have some time to help us understand the research of Dr Tessa Lawrie, who is making waves in the acadenic spaces with her considered work on Ivermectin as the best drug for COVID? If you have time, I would so appreciate your reflections on this.
Thanks! Mike
Thanks very much, Mike. I read rather than listen to podcasts but I did see something about that YouTube censorship. I just read today that WHO altered their vaccine advice following the lead of Google and Facebook. The ruling regime is not scientific in the sense of solving problems and engaging in the field. It is a technocratic regime based on bureaucracy and conformity. Chilling. I have long wanted to take a deep dive into ivermectin. The one doc I refer to quite a bit, Peter McCullough has been the US champion of treatment. Interestingly he refers quite a bit to a South African doctor in Port Edward who was using HCQ and Ivermectin then got shut down but managed to find a treatment regime of antihistamines tailored for each day of Covid. McCullough says he gets reports of stockpiles of ivermectin and HCQ being burnt. The fact that safe, normal drugs are being demonised is a huge warning sign and tells you something is very wrong, regardless of the degree of efficacy of those drugs. All takes you back to the vaccines in the end and shots in every arm. Thanks a lot for the feedback. Will take another look at the Weinstein material.
Hi Chris, thank you for your response. Re WHO: it is scary stuff when medicine starts to follow big tech recommendations - I will have a look at this. Thanks also for the recommendation of Dr McCullough.
Seeing as you prefer the reading process, here is a link to Dr Lawrie's publication on Ivermectin as the best drug for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348297284_Ivermectin_reduces_the_risk_of_death_from_COVID-19_-a_rapid_review_and_meta-analysis_in_support_of_the_recommendation_of_the_Front_Line_COVID-19_Critical_Care_Alliance_Latest_version_v12_-_6_Jan_2021
As far as I know, this has (and is being) peer-reviewed at the highest academic level.
Thanks again,
Mike