US Covid Commissars Caught Creating Deadly Coronaviruses in Frankenstein-style lab monstrosities

Another conspiracy theory turns out to be simply the news reported early.

I hate to include the image below.

A baby’s scalp grafted onto a ‘humanized’ mouse:

The scalp comes from a fetus aborted at 20 weeks. The scalp is intact, which would not normally happen at a mid-gestational abortion, in which the baby is cut up and dismembered. It could well be the owner of the scalp was born alive and terminated in what is known as a partial birth abortion, in which the abortionist delivers the baby and then severs the spinal cord outside the womb as the baby emerges.

This is horrific, of course, but for a doctor who does abortions in the womb, it is merely a method of abortion which puts the mother at less risk.

If it sounds more horrific to you than normal abortion, perhaps you need to think about the morality of normal abortion.

(By the way, Obama opposed putting an end to partial abortion three times as a state senator. Real healer, that Barack.)

To return to the image above, the photograph was taken during a research project at the University of Pittsburgh. And it thus turns out to be entirely true that fetal body parts are trafficked for experiments.

You may recognize this manif you flick through CNN from time to time or read Time magazine:

He is the global thought leader on Covid response, Anthony Fauci, the infectious disease chief of the US.

His organisation funded the experiment.

I include this to give you an idea of how the modern scientist thinks and behaves. This is normal to them. This is their reference when they give advice about how to live our lives and whether granny is allowed a hug. These are the people behind the vaccine.

Perhaps we could offer them one tiny quantum of grace if these people were reliable. But, no, medical research is a dumpster fire. Most published studies are simply false. John P. A. Ioannidis, Stanford Professor of medicine, introduced the term ‘replication crisis’, when he discovered that the vast majority of medical studies cannot be reproduced with the same results by independent researchers.

The media does not tell you this, just as they do not show you images of mice with baby scalps attached to their heads.

But there is not simply incompetence to be worried about.

It is overwhelmingly likely that Fauci’s organisation funded lab experiments which, ignoring protocol and risks, created Covid 19.

I have previously written on this theory, noting that the former Head of the US Center for Disease Control, Dr Robert Redfield, believes it:

“I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped…

“I do not believe this somehow came from a bat to a human. And at that moment in time, the virus came to the human, became one of the most infectious viruses that we know in humanity for human to human transmission. Normally, when a pathogen goes from a zoonotic to human, it takes a while for it to figure out how to become more and more efficient.”

Why on earth would a lab make a deadly virus, is the obvious question. Redfield provided the answer:

“Most of us in a lab, when trying to grow a virus, we try to help make it grow better, and better, and better, and better, and better, and better so we can do experiments and figure out about it.”

This is the science you must trust, or be ostracised by your own family and friends.

Fauci himself famously argued for this research years ago, writing in the Washington Post in 2011 that “much good can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory”.

I mean, what could go wrong?

And when the US government shut down this insanity, known as ‘gain of function’ research, Fauci simply shipped the creation of deadly viruses to, you guessed it, Wuhan! Trump would cut the funding when the Wuhan grants became public knowledge.

We all know this. But you are not meant to think about it too closely. And if you are, you are meant to blame the Chinese, as though the US were not the chief instigators.

One US senator has questioned Fauci about this, and, despite being medical doctor, gets dismissed by the media as a conspiracy theorist.

Here is Senator Rand Paul questioning Fauci, watch from 8.04 onward:

First of all, Fauci is not the kindly man of science he purports to be. Second, in the third round of questioning, watch how he tries to stop his left hand from shaking. Third, notice how he never once denies that funding flowed to Wuhan to play with animal viruses. He just says this was not ‘gain of function’. Does that make it ok? Apparently so, in the world of ‘science’.

The trouble for Fauci, and indeed the entire US government, is that he has now been caught in this deceptive obfuscation.

The liberal news site, The Intercept, just released a trove of documents related to grants from the US that flowed toward Wuhan, a city with no bat population except the ones in its lab of virology. To put it bluntly, in normal times, such documents would have ensured he would be on trial now for genocide and treason.

In short, the grants did fund research that did meet the definition of gain of function.

Pause here. It is now indisputable that the US was increasing the deadliness of bat viruses in Wuhan. What are the implications of this established fact?

Professor Richard Ebright, professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, concluded upon reading the documents:

Note, Fauci’s organisation is also funded by Bill Gates. But don’t think about that either.

What is more, the humanized mice return to the story here, because coronaviruses were tested on these creatures to see whether human cells could catch them.

I can find no discernible goal in this. The research did not purport to be finding cures or vaccines. it was a Frankenstein-like horror. At least in Frankenstein, the scientist takes responsibility. That is not the case here.

Fauci has been on CNN since. No questions concerning this were asked. He remains Biden’s chief scientific advisor. His organisation and its scientists will collect royalties from the vaccines.

Do you want to know why people are hesitant to take the vaccine?

Because these false gods of science are fundamentally untrustworthy.

They have not apologized or taken responsibility for anything. Even Martin Kulldorff, professor of infectious diseases at Harvard, acknowledges that science as we know it is finished:

The scientific establishment does not and will never admit that Swedish scientific humility (no school closures, no masks, no vaccine passports) is vastly superior to their insane power grabs. (See Australia. See surveillance robots in Singapore. UK planning another lockdown.)

Fetal body parts traffickers, Frankenstein-madmen, and media charlatans are ruling our lives. And corporate middle manager yes-men, will never push back.

Science, our great saviour, may just destroy us all.