39 Comments

I used Bayes' theorem, and, using the South Africa numbers, NOT getting the vaccine reduces your chance of being hospitalized by about 33%. Your article is right, Chris.

Expand full comment

Love your article Chris did you also note that they have defined people who have had a first Pfizer injection as being unvaccinated. This is absolute fraudulent manipulation of data with potentially deadly consequences.

Expand full comment

The UK has an average Covid death age of 83 where the average life expectancy in the UK is 81.

Of those Covid deaths , those who

Died under 40 had an average of 2 comorbidities. According to the NHS.

Expand full comment

The way they “keep” the numbers low for the vaxxed, is they only see you as vaccinated 21 days after your 2nd shot. That is how they can claim that the unvaxxed are the majority in hospital, which is BS.

My daughter and son-in-law are in emergency services and the fist question they ask the patient is “when did you get vaxxed?”

More than 80% that they are taking to hospital has had at least 1 shot

Expand full comment

Thanks Chris. Interresting, my wife is a docter. She also does blood analysis in her practice. Shocking to see the blood cell damage in vaccinated people versus those not vaccinated. She dont talk to much. But she said here is big trouble on its way.

Expand full comment

At last somebody who is not brainwashed by MSM. The madness behind the push to be jabbed is global totalitarianism and no one seems to care.

Expand full comment

Brilliant. Thank you Chris!

Expand full comment

The vaccines are neither safe nor effective. They will not stop you from getting Covid and they will not stop you from dying from Covid. You can still pass Covid on to others. You may die from the side effects of the vaccines, or be permanently disabled.

Can you think of any good reason to take the vaccines?

Expand full comment

> 94% of deaths listed an average of 3 co-morbidities.

Chris, I'm wondering if you could share any links to data for this? Thanks!

Expand full comment

So the SA government keeps referencing the success of the Sisonke trials when they refer to the success of the vaccines. is there data available as to how many of the healthcare workers enrolled in the trial had previously had covid? as this then would be the reason for the low rates of infection and not necessarily the J&J vaccine.

Expand full comment

The Covid shots are not about protection. They are Gene Therapy to purposely change one's DNA (genetic modification). The spike protein is a bio-weapon, a prion. Prions are associated with Mad Cow Disease and neuromuscular movement disorders seen in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's. Each shot puts a synthetic computer code into every cell of your body telling your cells to make more spike proteins which contain the prions.

Nothing is better than your own God-given immune system. No one gets a second case of Covid 19. Don't fall for the lies and hype. It's all propaganda intended to cause fear so you get the shot. These shots are dangerous. They turn you into an asymptomatic carrier of the virus. They cause your own immune system to be suppressed making you more susceptible to being sick this fall when you are re-exposed to the flu virus or any other corona virus, such as the common cold.

Gain of Function was used to make a virus which would not infect people much more infective to people. Evil people created the problem and then propagandized the world that they had the solution. It's all a LIE. The animal model is Humans. These evil people are using human beings as experimental subjects for their nefarious reasons. They concocted a virus not to kill people, but as a bio-weapon to maim people and harm economies all over the world. And that's exactly what has happened. The US and China are working together.

No one knows all of the ingredients in the vials and that's on purpose. Some ingredients we do know are 8 strains of HIV (Glyco protein 120), PRRA (4 amino acids put in purposely to puncture the blood brain barrier), Polysorbate 80, shellac of PEG (anti-freeze), poisonous tree bark from S. America, and hydro gel Matrix A. Ivermectin dissolves the hydro gel and that's why the government is making Ivermectin and other drugs which do work unavailable and/or very costly in the US and around the world. Evil is as evil does.

Expand full comment

Interesting article. You do know the the latest variant of the SARS/CoV2 virus has different symptoms and disease progression than the alpha and other versions.

Using other variants in the statistical model IS A BETA STATISTICAL ERROR. PLEASE TAKE A BASIC STATSTICS COURSE. YOU ARE WRONGLY MISLEADING PEOPLE !!!

LIKE THE FLU, YOU NEED A NEW VACCINE FOR EACH NEW VERSION OF THE SARS/CoV2 VIRUS!!!

Personally, I don't believe anyone should take a vaccine they are not comfortable with taking. However, they should be held responsible for their actions. For example, health insurance companies SHOULD NOT cover the costs of their hospitalizations as well as life insurance companies SHOULD NOT pay benefits for their deaths.

You are correct that vaccines will not stop SARS/CoV2. Like influenza, the Gennie is out of the bottle and we need to deal with it, more specifically prevent from primary income earners from dying or becoming permanently disabled and placing an increasing number of families on public assistance.

An example is Texas, anti-masker Chris Wallace, leaving his family begging for money on GoFund.me. How long do you think it will be before they'll be collecting welfare and Medicaid ? Why should I, or anyone else, have to pay for Chris Wallace's poor decisions ?

As for people controlling the SARS/CoV2 virus without mRNA vaccine interventions is a psychotic delusion. mRNA vaccines is the quickest method available today, albeit a big stick approach.

Hopefully, there will be a time where people promoting anti-vax will be held liable for the damages inflicted on others. IMO, anti-vax promoters should charged with criminal fraud. The fraud is not for causing the deaths' of people, but for unfair burden as financial losses on others' taxation and increased insurance premiums to cover the costs of their readers' poor decisions.

Expand full comment