A New Era of Anarcho-Tyranny for South Africa and the Global Liberal Empire

Liberalism does not equal freedom. It equals chaos governed by tyrants.

In South Africa, if your business or suburb is being looted, or your university is being burnt down, you will not find police protection forthcoming. Yet hundreds of thousands of arrests were made for lockdown offences.

If you do not cover your face, you can get arrested. If you say a bad word, you can get arrested. If you question a vaccine, you can be vilified and ruthlessly slandered in public. Yet 50 murders are said to be committed daily.

Rent-seekers like our president, who leveraged his political position to become a billionaire, are celebrated. Politicians who sing songs about killing race groups face no consequences.

If you misspeak somewhat regarding colonialism, however, you will be condemned – even if you had previously put your life on the line against apartheid and, unlike your political rivals, live modestly and send your kids to public schools.

This is the endgame of multicultural, secular, democratic liberalism. It is not a bug in the system. It is the system.

South Africa, with its globally celebrated multiculturalism, with its progressive constitution, and its liberal messiah, Nelson Mandela, is the forerunner of a new world order. Perhaps this is why the country is so similar to the US right now, with failing cities, black-outs, riots, looting, and woke brainwashing in the education system.

(Ironically, as in South Africa, the failing cities keep being won by the same left-wing parties which ruined them – Trump was never adequately rebutted when he asked why all the most crime-ridden, polluted cities in the US are run by the Democrats.)

And in this new world order, of failing infrastructure and up to date new-fangled puritanism, dissent from the technocratic, scientific, liberal ideology is severely punished. But normal immorality is not.

If your child goes to an elite South African school, and in a burst of madness says the wrong word, they may have their life ruined. But you may not question the fact that the most prominent NGO used by private schools for sex ed employs a homeopath who does not identify as any gender, and who teaches in so-called church schools such topics as how to stimulate the clitoris, how to masturbate, and how to explore the gender continuum.

The system is imperial in that liberalism seeks to melt away any philosophical, religious or communitarian opposition to its desire for a blank citizenry which stands naked before its power. Consumers are sought, not communities. Sexual desire is valorised above procreation. Families crumble. But immigrants fill the gap as cheap labour for big woke capital.

The so-called free market and the nanny state work together to entrench a new way of being which is alternately lonely and crowded, pleasurable and ugly, safe and crime-ridden, hygienic and unhealthy. Liberal – yet smothering of the human spirit and all endeavour toward excellence.

This essay will be longer and more historical than usual. It will trace this new global liberal tyranny in history and in its ideology. This essay will function as a kind of political statement which will hopefully generate debate and galvanize, at an admittedly humble and small scale, a kind of nascent opposition to a regime whose reach is extending into very corner of the globe.

What is anarcho-tyranny?

It is the paradox that the modern liberal state enforces its laws arbitrarily and imposes both chaos and legalism upon its subjects.

In the USA, murals and statues are built of George Floyd, who famously stuck a pistol to a pregnant woman’s stomach whilst he robbed her, in only one of his felonies. You can get cancelled for saying a bad word – but violent crime is easily swept under the carpet. Meanwhile statues of the men who founded the nation at great personal risk are being burnt down, aided and abetted by state authorities.

These statues being marked for destruction include the men who fought to end slavery. In Canada, the highly sinister Queen Elizabeth II has had her image destroyed. Martin Luther King still stands strong in all his memorials, despite having been credibly shown to have committed gang rape.

Burning down courthouses and churches and looting were treated last year as righteous acts. CNN famously asked, where does it say protests should be peaceful?

Property can be replaced (but tell that to the many black business owners whose livelihoods were destroyed). In Seattle, a rapper became an armed warlord of a whole section of the city. This was supported by local authorities, until children kept being murdered. A veteran black cop was murdered. The media barely reported it.

It does not matter if marches were not social distanced. The covid plague suddenly was not as deadly as American racism.

Meanwhile, disrupting a government proceeding (without any weapons) because it was obvious further investigation was needed in an election during which counting mysteriously stopped in the middle of the night, after which a senile man who could not attract a crowd to a single event suddenly shot ahead in the count, can land you in solitary confinement without trial, subject to torture, for an apparent act of terrorism.

However, a woman who actually planted a bomb in the Capitol building now serves as a wealthy and influential leading light in the BLM movement, a movement which has seen millions of people kneel down in subservience to it.

In the same country, you can lose a scholarship or a job if you question the regime of LGBTQ training, affirmative action, masking, vaccinating with drugs not yet fully approved, or even declaring your Christian faith in such a way that signals your agreement with the Bible in its plainest statements concerning sexuality.

You can abort a baby without the consent of father, but you cannot refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding. Even fathers may not refuse a sex change for their children. Exposing young children to leather kinks in gay pride marches is seen as a good.

In South Africa, you must give the ANC the benefit of the doubt at all times. You must certainly not bring up the fact that our constitution was hatched by Roelf Meyer and Cyril Ramaphosa whilst sipping neat whisky and enjoying the hospitality and flyfishing waters of a notorious paedophile.

You certainly must not point out that Winnie Mandela had young men killed, or that Shaka Zulu displaced more people from their land or has more blood on his hands than any other Southern African leader. It is not even close.

In the midst of this chaos, you must not complain about farm murders. You must not dissent from the blood libel of white privilege and other insane ideologies, such as LGBTQI pride. And now you must wear a mask and celebrate Big Pharma products. You can question and denigrate religion – but you will face public shame if you question our new health overlords.

An abortion is granted no questions asked. Dare to suggest you do not want a vaccine placed in you, and see how consistently the old canard of ‘my body, my choice’ is applied.

In France, right now, those who do not want to get vaccinated because they are not at risk from covid will soon face prison time if they enter a restaurant.

Vaccine passports are being rolled out across Europe. Even as we learn that vaccines do not prevent transmission.

You can get arrested in France for saying the wrong thing about the Holocaust. But you may be celebrated internationally if you depict the Blessed Trinity as a homosexual tryst. And when churches are burnt down, you should not expect any kind of serious investigation as to who is doing this or why.

In the UK, because of your immigrant status you may be given a free pass to run a child rape syndicate. In Germany, because you oppose Catholicism and conservatism, you may be allowed to farm out children to paedophiles, in some insane bid to use child sex to undo Nazism, whilst designing the sex ed curriculum for the nation:

But if you try to home-school your children, the police will come knocking at your door.

If you are Canadian, you could have a SWAT team arrest you in public if you try to hold a church service:

But do not expect any sympathy as scores of churches are being burnt down. Take your jab and keep your head down.

Liberal Australia is locking up millions of citizens and telling them not to talk to friends because an 80-year-old man died of a respiratory complication.

The New Zealand Prime Minister recently told her citizens not to trust any independent media but to look to her government as “the single source of truth.”

Even if you live in Vietnam, if you test positive for a virus which has a fatality rate akin to flu for the healthy, non-elderly, your children may be taken from you and drowned in plastic, but the global community of liberal experts will not come to your defence:

In India, you may be one of the 400 000 who died for lack of receiving routine healthcare as hospitals turned them away as lockdown protocol in preparation of a very brief wave of covid. You may be one of the million migrant workers sent away to die of starvation.

Yet if you protest or question these things, the media will barely cover it. If they do, it will be to denounce you as a bigoted anti-science retrograde.

This is anarcho-tyranny.

Where does anarcho-tyranny come from?

It is the endgame of liberalism.

It is a fact not widely known that the modern liberal era was birthed in world wars launched by the forces of liberalism. The rise of nation states and nationalism was not right wing. It was liberal. Italy, Republican France, Imperial Britain, were dominated not by the supporters of throne and altar, but by liberals who sought a national glory based on a hegemonic general will, in order to construct entities devoted to their ideal of rationalism and secularism.

Garibaldi was a liberal. Robespierre was a liberal. Even Napoleon was a liberal as he toppled dynasties and imprisoned the Pope. The Russian elites who got rid of the Tsar and paved the way for the Bolsheviks were liberals. Dostoevsky had pointed out long before that the coming nihilistic socialists were but the natural children of the liberals of his day who believed anything hitherto regarded as sacred was irrational and the enemy of progress.

By 1918, the liberalism of France, Britain, its virulent strain in Communist Russia, and its progressive social gospel cousin in Woodrow Wilson-USA, reigned supreme after years of young men dying in the dirt and mud of wintry Europe.

Bourbon city states in Italy were long gone. France as a Charlemagne- and Louis IX- style project of Catholic renaissance and baptism of a Roman ideal of law and order and education had vanished. The Holy Roman Empire of Austria and the Habsburgs had died with the last Emperor, Blessed Karl, in exile on Madeira. Russian self-conception as Holy Rus, founded by St Vladimir, and dwelling in the Third Rome of Moscow, had perished under the concrete of Bolshevism.

A sense of a greater Christendom to hold and limit nationalisms had vanished. Industrialism and mass education reigned. Art and architecture died. Public housing created an underclass.

Decades later, when the inevitable sequel to the first war came, in the shape of an insane right wing revanchism, unhinged from the limits of normal moral conscience, we still must reckon with the moral complications and compromises undertaken by the Allies.

When one reads of Roosevelt’s US administration during World War II, one finds a regime infested with Communist sympathizers, ready to hand China over to Mao, to give Stalin everything he wanted despite no assurances he would not dominate the entirety of Europe. Stalin was to be the virile partner in a new global regime – a hardman cousin of liberal order. It was only the likes of George Kennan who woke the US up to the reality of Stalin in time to stave off total failure. (George Kennan, the arch anti-communist, would later visit the Allied-bombed cities of Hamburg and Dresden and declare that nothing could have justified that level of destruction of civilian cities.)

Yet, as we see now, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a neo-Marxism hostile to religion, to western civilization, won the spiritual battle after all.

After World War II, a mythology was birthed that a war in which the Americans admittedly committed war crimes by carpet-bombing civilians, in which Churchill began the bombing of civilians for the sake of propaganda, and in which the bulk of the fighting was conducted by the Soviet regime, the bloodiest of all time, was supposedly a holy war against totalitarianism and all things dictatorial, for the sake of rational liberalism.

It is time to face the fact that the war to defeat the evil, genocidal Hitler was won by a deal with a devil: Stalin and his Communist lackeys. That Stalin was supported at a time when his body count dwarfed Hitler’s. (The Nazis would never catch up.) That it directly handed China over to a maniac who killed more people than was thought possible. It did not prevent the Holocaust. It is not some untarnished source of holy pride.

Churchill himself had noted that the wars of peoples would be more terrible than the wars of kings. Nevertheless, he would position himself as a leader at the heart of enflaming two of these wars. These wars were total wars because liberalism is a totalizing force.

A realistic view of these wars is necessary because they serve as the founding myth of the modern liberal order. And the liberal order is not a pure space for freedom and self-expression which it claims for itself. Its so-called freedom is very tenuous, and not equally applied.

What I mean is that liberalism imagines itself as a neutral view of reality, a final victory over mythology and superstition, and therefore opposition cannot even be imagined, nor can competitors, in the shape of traditional community, be brooked.

The covid apocalypse

The illusion that liberalism was a kind of neutral space in which ideas can compete has finally been made evident by the insanity of covid in which it has been made painfully obvious we are not ruled by rational, freedom-loving people.

We know lockdowns do not work. The bourgeois middle class supported them anyway, because it made them feel good. And now people starve around the world.

The masks do not work. They just mangle the sense of seeing other people as humans and not mere germ vectors.

The vaccines provide the key lesson.

The original trials of the vaccines claimed that the vaccines were highly effective at reducing transmission. We know now this is not true. Vaccinated nations are experiencing a surge in cases. Yet the insane push to mandate them continues. France will punish you with prison if you do not get jabbed. This is coming all over the world – unless there is a stubborn refusal by a significant minority to simply say no.

Vaccines do seem to prevent death, although this was not the premise under which emergency authorisation was granted them. But it is also obvious that they are nowhere near as effective as natural immunity. Natural immunity may be forty times more effective and it is historically better than vaccines at reducing new variant escape from protection.

What is certain is that mandating them remains madness, as if it only helps the individual, it should be for the individual to weigh the risk of taking an experimental vaccine.

Think about this for a moment – a global authority is gearing up to force you to be injected before you are allowed to go in public. I know there are many pro-vaccine people of good faith who just want to save lives, but risk and benefit ratios must be re-calibrated. Let the vulnerable take the vaccine. But to support this propaganda will up-end human society as we know it.

In the most vaccinated nations of Israel and the UK, serious cases are increasing rapidly. Vaccine efficacy could be fleeting. In which case, booster shots will likely be mandated, as they are already being in Israel. This has already been demonstrated by the fact that a nation like Switzerland only grants a vaccine passport which holds for six months.

Government jabs every six months, or prison. This is now more than likely in many parts of the so-called developed world. Yes, this is liberalism. 2+2=5. No questions.

This regime is one dominated by a nexus of corporations and scientists who have in no way earned our trust.

In this new dystopia, we must certainly ignore the fact that the pharmaceutical companies had no compunction in pushing painkillers on an American population which has seen exponentially more drug overdose deaths than covid deaths.

A record 70 000 people overdosed during lockdown, and companies like Johnson and Johnson have to pay out $26 billion for distributing deadly drugs which they claimed were not addictive. (This will not threaten their profitability and nobody will be jailed – unlike you may be for not wearing a mask.) Bear in mind, these drug companies carry no liability for their vaccines.

Vaccines are the sacraments of the new global religion. Do not be naive. This is not based on scientific rationality. Hence it is not to be questioned. We are given orders:

Listen to the doctors.

Listen to the scientists.

Do not question the evolution story which gives rise to the priestly authority of the mystical body of knowledge known as “science” – despite there being no possible way to explain by evolution the emergence of one single cell.

(Where did the DNA information come from for the first living being? The current best theory from the DNA discoverer is via an alien sperm gun aimed at the earth. This is the “science” people slobber over on social media.)

So the common masses are to acquiesce to these grand experts. Take your shot. Get a digital passport, and await further orders –

But some of us are getting ready to say no…

What is to be done?

By now we must realize that the regime will not help us. If you protest against the rioting, the police will likely arrest you. Police around the world already want to take away any firearms used for defence. There is no space in the liberal regime for dissent, for other power.

The churches will not come to your aid if you hold to traditional religion. The institutions have been captured.

Communities that resist the regime must be built. It may be that this is best done in the third world where there is still some dissent from the global order and space outside a totalizing state.

Why not buy a city in South Africa – in exchange for the land Julius wants, or the medical aid and pension funds Cyril wants? Why not support the likes of Paul Kagame in Rwanda? There are other African countries which resist liberal madness. Why not support them too?

Above all, your soul must be prioritized. It is not worth losing your soul to gain the world. (And your soul is the form of your body, which must also resist the plastic pollution of the regime.)

The ugliness of modern architecture must be resisted. Beauty in music and in building must be restored.

This will not be easy. And we will probably fail. But, to be honest, resistance is exhilarating. And fun, compared to a grey world of the last men. The inter-racial community policing forces, praying before night shifts, the faith groups who gathered with farmers, as they faced rioters and looters, can all attest to the rush of camaraderie and brotherhood. And there are more of us than we think. We just need to raise a banner to which we can all gather.

And we can learn one lesson from the Communists:

It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees.