The World`s Leaders Exempt Themselves from Social Distancing - Amidst Tenuous Evidence of Vaccine Effectiveness
And Johnson set to keep UK shut down.
The leaders of the G7 - the Group of of Seven of the most economically advanced liberal democracies - gathered in Cornwall, England last week.
They did not quarantine. They did not wear masks. They sipped drinks, barbecued, and patted each other on the back for the great jobs they think they are doing. Look at Trudeau`s face above. Canada, right now, arrests people for leaving their homes and going to church.
The Queen was there, happily mingling as an elderly woman with these leaders who have flown in from around the world. Cyril Ramaphosa was there. Joe Biden wandered around, barely aware that he was there.
Boris Johnson spouted forth the usual Covid dystopian platitudes of building back better, building back greener, and added to this by saying we needed to build back more feminine. Not sure what that means, but it seems like he is gender stereotyping and should be shunned by polite society!
Friends, we need to understand the meaning of all of this.
These leaders arrive in masks, give each other the elbow of greeting, line up for a socially distanced photograph, and then live normally and plan your future for you, including a new global tax. They are not afraid of Covid!
Why do they not even hide their hypocrisy?
They WANT you to know they are lying. At each step of the pandemic, the scientists and politicians and media figures have been caught breaking the commandments they have insisted we all follow.
The great Soviet dissident, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, wrote of his regime:
“We know that they are lying, they know that they are lying, they even know that we know they are lying, we also know that they know we know they are lying too, they of course know that we certainly know they know we know they are lying too as well, but they are still lying. In our country, the lie has become not just moral category, but the pillar industry of this country.”
The final goal of propaganda is not to convince you of anything, it is simply to embarrass you at your own powerlessness.
Theodore Dalrymple said this on this issue:
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
Today Boris Johnson is expected to announce that lockdown in Britain will not end as promised next week. Masks and social distancing will continue.
You were told that vaccinations were the way out. Britain is, behind Israel, the most vaccinated nation on earth.
Yet the UK and unvaccinated South Africa have the same number of daily cases virtually right now. India is barely vaccinated and their daily rate has plummeted. There is no distinction between the highly vaccinated and less vaccinated states in the US in terms of falling infections.
You were told to get vaccinated and this will all end.
The vaccination pass about to be rolled out in Switzerland is only valid for 180 days.
This is not a one-off shot. You will need to get jabbed, over and over and over again.
(That`s the Belgian Health Minister above, by the way. On the left.)
And don`t be naive in thinking that Covid and its variants will be the only mass panic issue in the days ahead. Climate lockdowns and new mRNA vaccines are already being discussed.
Experts advising governments are openly talking about masks becoming permanent, or lockdowns continuing every season of respiratory illness. They were not joking when they said there would be a new normal!
I am sure many of you are thinking that perhaps I have misunderstood the vaccines, that they are not meant to reduce transmission but simply severe illness. That is what we are told, yes, but that is not how the vaccines were tested and sold to us originally.
If you look at the tests which gave the vaccines emergency approval (they still only have emergency approval), they specifically did not release date about deaths, but only transmission.
Pfizer claimed, after their tests of 40 000 odd people, with half getting a placebo, that their vaccine was 95% effective because 162 unvaccinated people got Covid whilst only 8 vaccinated people got Covid. The relative difference is roughly 95%.
Of course, if you look at absolute risk for all participants, you only reduce your risk by less than one percent overall by taking the vaccine, so they used a different metric to dazzle you and pump up their share prices (many of their executives sold shares the day of their vaccine announcements - which they had delayed a week to avoid good news heading into the US election).
The other vaccines all claimed something similar. The point was to reduce transmission.
How has it worked out in the real world?
Let me take you inside one of the major studies which came out of Israel recently, a study which was pointed to by global authorities as a definitive sign of the grand effectiveness of the vaccines.
Researchers from Israel and Harvard tracked 596 618 vaccinated people and 596 618 non-vaccinated people.
They found the following differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated:
Infections: 4460 versus 6100
Symptomatic Covid: 2389 versus 3607
Hospitalisation: 110 versus 259
Severe illness: 55 versus 174
Deaths: 9 versus 32
So the vaccine has an effect, right? But I am sure you would be surprised that these numbers are not as striking in difference as you thought they would be.
It gets worse.
If you study the two cohorts, the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, you find the following differences in existing illnesses between the two groups:
The unvaccinated group had 1500 more people with heart disease, 900 more who had severe obesity, and 800 more diabetics. The authors hoped you would not read this bit.
Yet there were only 23 fewer deaths from or with Covid (who knows?) in the vaccinated group. That`s statistically insignificant given the differences in health.
It gets even worse.
The study did not release the raw number of deaths in each group. You can bet your life that this was because raw deaths were significantly higher in the vaccinated group, meaning that there may have been a few deaths resulting from the vaccine which would erase the advantage of the vaccine even further.
So what did the study conclude?
“This study estimates a high effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine for preventing symptomatic Covid-19 in a noncontrolled setting, similar to the vaccine efficacy reported in the randomized trial. Our study also suggests that effectiveness is high for the more serious outcomes: hospitalization, severe illness, and death.”
Meanwhile, deaths for young people in Israel have mysteriously shot up:
This is how modern science works. Subterfuge and cherry-picking.
I am no disciple of scientific peer-reviewed studies.
Nobody should be. Medical science has a massive replication crisis in that studies can very rarely be replicated, meaning they are incredibly unreliable.
But studies are interesting as exercises in speech. They have debunking value. If medical authorities are going to cite studies to get us to do stuff, then we can go and look at studies and verify for ourselves their honesty and internal consistency.
But you won`t find this scientific rigour. You will find glaring contradictions, half-truths, distorted statistics and percentages, and claims to certainty unfounded upon real world experience.
That`s how the experts got people to quaff down margarine and vegetable oil for decades out of concern for your heart and cholesterol. That`s why the guy who pioneered frontal lobotomies won a Nobel Prize. And that`s why they tell you to wear a mask with no evidence that they do anything at all.
Use your own common sense.
How many leading politicians and celebrities around the world have died? How afraid do they appear to be of the virus? How many people close to you, otherwise healthy, and not very old, have died? You can trust that knowledge. Don`t fixate on India and Brazil, or stories from experts or any media.
Remember, for experts and leaders, this has been the best year of their lives. They are not just going to switch this thing off. They bask in the glow of importance and power.
The lies add up. But each time you refuse to continue the lie, each time you do not go along with sounding respectable and like a serious-minded person in society, you can create a ripple of truth.
Historically, we need to remember that things can go horribly wrong. Leaders stumbled into World War I and its horrors, followed by World War II. Clever people today still defend the bloodiest regimes of all time, Communist Russia and China.
There is no guarantee that a civilisation will not destroy everything good within it. And the destruction always begins in the name of justice and goodness.
We have a new world order predicated on `health` and cleanliness. I have a feeling we are not headed for a future that is healthy or clean.
If you feel this is worth reading, please share and encourage others to subscribe. The media is useless and corrupt. This free service will take you on a journey that at the very least will be a lot more interesting than any mainstream media outlet.