The Airtight Scientific Case for Abandoning All Restrictions in South Africa and Keeping Vaccination Entirely Voluntary
And the same applies for the entire world too.
South Africa has had a rough lockdown.
The crime stats have gone through the roof and are a national tragedy. (But rest assured the media will continue to headline the odd unvaccinated death, far more scandalous than rape or murder apparently.)
Here is a taste of the horrific stats:
Unemployment has soared to its highest ever. Around half the workforce is unemployed. The country now has the highest unemployment rate in the world.
I said at the beginning that, considering the death rate, and the low odds lockdown would change anything, shutting down human life and sinking the economy and with it an entire generation, was insane. But I could not even convince the majority of my friends of this.
So we watched South Africa burn, and other countries around the world descended into the abyss too.
In the UK, a million new alcoholics have been created. So probably a million families badly damaged for good.
In Australia, the lockdowns have caused this:
Mass starvation, oceans full of masks, millions of kids at home abused, lost to education forever. We can go on and on. This is our world now.
This is the world the lockdown and vax proponents continue to make for us, whilst continuing to slate people like myself as anti-science, as conspiracy theorists, or as right-wing morons.
And what good did this even do in curbing the virus?
Here is a truth grenade from one of South Africa's most important health and data analysts.
The chief actuary of Discovery Health, the largest private health insurer in South Africa, believes 80 percent of the country has had covid.
With all the restrictions, basically everybody got it anyway.
This is reported with zero self-awareness. Discovery Health does not question its own support for the insane restrictions. The media makes no pause in its relentless approval of government police state measures.
And certainly nobody points out that such an admission means all current and future measures are completely pointless.
Yet the country presses on with masks and distancing and mass vaccination.
Despite this being well-established, in numerous studies:
Despite this, the most obvious thing in the world, being true:
In short, according to even the scientists who got us into this mess, it is all over. This sick revolution must be undone. The whole lot of it. Mass testing, vax propaganda, masks.
But that is not going to happen.
This thing has never operated on rationality.
It is a meme. The real virus is the reaction, the opportunism to create a new medical state premised on a yeast-like existence, free of risk, but free of life too, in which you are but a figure in the algorithm of the world-state nerd-sun-kings.
If rationality mattered, this chart would have changed everything:
This chart would have induced a pause on the third jabs:
People would be going to jail for this:
Kids (kids!) would not still face assault with oppressive measures that do nothing:
(By the way, have you ever wondered why your kid has to wear a mask for hours at a desk, while you can go to a restaurant down the road, and sit down mask free for as long as you want?)
Even if lockdowns worked, they were not worth it. And they don't work. Double the evil.
And admitting that, in South Africa, the vast majority do not need a vaccine, while still pushing everybody to get it, knowing it is more risky than any other vaccine in use, is, again, evil.
Attacking people for not getting a vaccine, simply because they want to know how many jabs the regimen requires before they start, or because they have had covid already, or because it is their body and not yours, is, again, evil.
But this evil is not just out there, emanating from the laptop class who make money at home while kids are treated as cattle and the working class lose their jobs. It is in us.
When Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn reflected on his time in the gulag archipelago, he did not merely blame the Bolsheviks.
He instead concluded the following:
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward… We submitted with pleasure.”
We submitted with pleasure.
I could not agree more.
It's so refreshing to stumble across like minded, rational thinking journalism.