One opinion I hold that even my simpaticos find a bit controversial is that smoking laws presaged covid laws.
As with covid, South Africa was a pioneer in this regard, ratifying World Health Organisation frameworks in the legislature, verbatim. (Sound familiar?)
I, for one, will always remember fondly watching the Benson & Hedges night cricket series at Newlands cricket ground in Cape Town as a young boy, and, later, when I lived in Durban, going down to North Beach to the Gunston 500 surfing contest. Not to mention the Camel and Marlboro-sponsored Formula One racing I would watch with my dad and brother on Sundays.
I miss the aesthetics of it, I think. And I wonder if it is really an improvement for us to be bombarded by gambling and beer advertising instead of tobacco.
In 2020, the South African government would famously include a ban on smoking as part of its hard lockdown, and that seemed to confirm the notion that public health regulation of smoking was a precursor to declarations of what amounted to martial law to prevent (?) transmission of a respiratory virus harmless for nearly the entirety of the population.
I am certain that tobacco is not good for you. But I am equally certain that government crackdowns on smoking, while liberalizing marijuana and opioid use, belie that this is really done for the sake of our health.
Tucker Carlson stunningly made this (heretical) case on his now-cancelled news show:
One could even argue that rampant discouragement and social-shaming of cigarette smoking simply opens the door for other, less social vices, such as drugs or mass sugar and oil consumption.
One of the first things I recall upon moving to Europe was how much thinner and healthier people looked compared with South Africans, or the images one sees from the US. Yet, outdoors, I saw more smokers than I had ever seen in similar settings at home.
This should not be the case, however, according to health authorities.
Europeans smoke at a very high rate, drink lots of coffee and wine, and eat fatty cheeses.
Is it doing them great harm?
What gives?
Could it be that smoking in moderation is nowhere near as bad for you as eating the modern slop recommended by most dieticians?
The issue is accelerating.
Even as western nations eat more and more unhealthily, even as marijuana and hard drug use is more and more liberalised, these same nations are cracking down harder and harder on nicotine.
Rishi Sunak has proposed new tobacco legislation that would eliminate all legal cigarette sales within a generation.
Jacinda Ardern did the same in New Zealand, although it has since been scrapped by the new government.
To my mind, this all of a piece with the ever encroaching ‘safetyism’ by which government invades daily life more and more.
Should restaurants, hotels, planes, and offices be allowed to ban smoking on their premises? Of course. Should the likes of Ardern, Sunak, and Cyril Ramaphosa ban you from ever enjoying a cigar after dinner? The question answers itself.
Whenever I think about this issue I recall a beloved short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, entitled ‘Thank You for the Light’, originally published in 1936 by the New Yorker magazine, concerning a tired heroine, a cool, dark cathedral, and a quiet cigarette.
It is concise and beautifully out of date.
Enjoy:
‘Thank You for the Light’
By F. Scott Fitzgerald
Mrs. Hanson was a pretty, somewhat faded woman of forty, who sold corsets and girdles, travelling out of Chicago. For many years her territory had swung around through Toledo, Lima, Springfield, Columbus, Indianapolis, and Fort Wayne, and her transfer to the Iowa-Kansas-Missouri district was a promotion, for her firm was more strongly entrenched west of the Ohio.
Eastward, she had known her clientele chattily and had often been offered a drink or a cigarette in the buyer’s office after business was concluded. But she soon found that in her new district things were different. Not only was she never asked if she would like to smoke but several times her own inquiry as to whether anyone would mind was answered half apologetically with “It’s not that I mind, but it has a bad influence on the employees.”
“Oh, of course, I understand.”
Smoking meant a lot to her sometimes. She worked very hard and it had some ability to rest and relax her psychologically. She was a widow and she had no close relatives to write to in the evenings, and more than one moving picture a week hurt her eyes, so smoking had come to be an important punctuation mark in the long sentence of a day on the road.
The last week of her first trip on the new circuit found her in Kansas City. It was mid-August and she felt somewhat lonely among all her new contacts, so she was delighted to find at the outer desk of one firm a woman she had known in Chicago. She sat down before having herself announced and in the course of the conversation found out a little about the man she was going to see.
“Will he mind if I smoke?”
“What? My God, yes!” her friend said. “He’s given money to support the law against it.”
“Oh. Well, I’m grateful for the advice—more than grateful.”
“You better watch it everywhere around here,” her friend said. “Especially with the men over fifty. The ones who weren’t in the war. A man told me that nobody who was in the war would ever object to anyone smoking.”
But at her very next stop Mrs. Hanson ran into the exception. He seemed a pleasant young man but his eyes fixed with so much fascination on the cigarette that she was tapping on her thumbnail that she put it away. She was rewarded when he asked her to lunch and during the hour she obtained a considerable order.
Afterward, he insisted on driving her to her next appointment, though she had intended to spot a hotel in the vicinity and take a few puffs in the washroom.
It was one of those days full of waiting—everyone was busy, was late, and it seemed that when the clients did appear they were the sort of hatchet-faced men who did not like other people’s self-indulgence, or they were women willingly or unwillingly committed to the ideas of these men.
She hadn’t smoked since breakfast and she suddenly realized that that was why she felt a vague dissatisfaction at the end of each call, no matter how successful it had been in a business way.
She would say, “We think we cover a different field. It’s all rubber and canvas, of course, but we do manage to put them together in a different way. A thirty-per-cent increase in national advertising in one year tells its own story.”
And to herself she was thinking, If I could just get three puffs I could sell old-fashioned whalebone.
She had one more store to visit now but her appointment was not for half an hour. That was just time to go to her hotel but, as there was no taxi in sight, she walked along the street, thinking, Perhaps I ought to give up cigarettes. I’m getting to be a drug fiend.
Before her, she saw the Catholic cathedral. It seemed very tall, and suddenly she had an inspiration: if so much incense had gone up in the spires to God, a little smoke in the vestibule would make no difference. How could the Good Lord care if a tired woman took a few puffs in the vestibule?
Nevertheless, though she was not a Catholic, the thought offended her. Was it so important that she have her cigarette, when it might offend a lot of other people, too?
Still. He wouldn’t mind, she thought persistently. In His days, they hadn’t even discovered tobacco. . . .
She went into the church; the vestibule was dark, and she felt for a match in the bag she carried but there weren’t any.
I’ll go and get a light from one of their candles, she thought.
The darkness of the nave was broken only by a splash of light in one corner. She walked up the aisle toward the white blur, and found that it was not made by candles and, in any case, it was about to go out—an old man was on the point of extinguishing a last oil lamp.
“These are votive offerings,” he said. “We put them out at night. We think it means more to the people who give them to save them for next day than it would to keep them burning all night.”
“I see.”
He struck out the last one. There was no light left in the cathedral now, save an electric chandelier high overhead and the ever-burning lamp in front of the Sacrament.
“Good night,” the sexton said.
“Good night.”
“I guess you came here to pray.”
“Yes, I did.”
He went out into the sacristy. Mrs. Hanson knelt down and prayed.
It had been a long time since she had prayed. She scarcely knew what to pray for, so she prayed for her employer, and for the clients in Des Moines and Kansas City. When she had finished praying, she knelt up. An image of the Madonna gazed down upon her from a niche, six feet above her head.
Vaguely she regarded it. Then she got up from her knees and sank back wearily in the corner of the pew. In her imagination, the Virgin came down, like in the play “The Miracle,” and took her place and sold corsets and girdles for her and was tired, just as she was. Then for a few minutes Mrs. Hanson must have slept.
She awoke at the realization that something had changed, and gradually she perceived that there was a familiar scent that was not incense in the air and that her fingers smarted. Then she realized that the cigarette she held in her hand was alight—was burning.
Still too drowsy to think, she took a puff to keep the flame alive. Then she looked up at the Madonna’s vague niche in the half-darkness.
“Thank you for the light,” she said.
That didn’t seem quite enough, so she got down on her knees, the smoke twisting up from the cigarette between her fingers.
“Thank you very much for the light,” she said. ♦
—1936
Good musings Chris thank you. I will be in Simons Town next Monday leaving these dismal isles at last and looking forward to some sailing at FBYC. You reminded me of that classic cigarette advert in the 1960s for 'Strand cigarettes - "Your never alone with a Strand" - didn't sell the ciggies but it sold lots of white 3/4 macs - a classic fail:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjBHUQEiTPw
And for an SA laugh - you will appreciate this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYOIbXJTVIc
Happy days are here again!
Blessings
AP
Great post
I hate cigarette smoke, but totally agree that laws to prohibit it seem to go to far.
I noticed at work that those few people who smoked formed a social group when they went outside to smoke, and it was a group I could not be in because I can't stand smoke as I have bad lungs. I think they were more cohesive socially than those who did not smoke, as they looked down on the smokers.
I think that smokers can be very insensitive too, but to turn them into social outcasts is also problematic.
I doubt we could have won any of the World Wars without people using cigarettes to settle their shattered nerves, and it was often given as a ration to all soldiers, for those who didn't smoke it was something they could barter with other for.
Lots of contradictions in this issue, maybe we should just tell people to "do unto the other as they would have done to them"- a good old Christian teaching?